| Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card, 2005-06 |
| For Phillips-Freedom Community Day School |
| Address: | 4725 River Grove Dr., Paso Robles CA 93446- | Phone Number: | (805) 237-8582 |
| Principal: | Ed Brown | Grade Span: | 7-11 |
| This executive summary of the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) is intended to provide parents and community members with a quick snapshot of school accountability. The data presented in this report are reported for the 2005-06 school year, except the School Finances and School Completion data that are reported for the 2004-05 school year. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should review the entire SARC or contact the school principal or the district office. |
| About This School |
| The mission statement of Freedom High School is that all graduates have the tools to be effective citizens in our society; to be honest, responsible, cooperative, and respectful; and to be prepared for further education, employment, and lifelong learning. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
School Facilities
| Summary of Most Recent Site Inspection |
| Inspected 9/28/06. No major deficiencies found. Minor concerns being addressed through normal work order system. |
| Repairs Needed |
| No major repairs necessary. Minor concerns addressed through normal work order system. |
| Corrective Actions Taken or Planned |
| No major repairs necessary. Minor concerns addressed through normal work order system. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2005-06 Published During 2006-07 |
| The School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which is required by law to be published annually, contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. More information about SARC requirements is available at the California Department of Education (CDE) Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest, an online data tool at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/, contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. |
I. About This School
Contact Information
This section provides the school's contact information.
| School | District | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| School Name | Phillips-Freedom Community Day | District Name | Paso Robles Joint Unified |
| Street | 4725 River Grove Dr. | Phone Number | 805.238.2222 |
| City, State, Zip | Paso Robles, CA 93446- | Web Site | www.pasoschools.org |
| Phone Number | (805) 237 - 3482 | Superintendent | Patrick J. Sayne, Ed.D. |
| Principal | Bill Spencer | E-mail Address | psayne@king.prps.k12.ca.us |
| E-mail Address | bspencer@king.prps.k12.ca.us | --- | --- |
School Description and Mission Statement
This section provides information about the school's goals and programs.
| The mission of |
Opportunities for Parental Involvement
This section provides information about opportunities for parents to become involved with school activities.
Four times a year Phillips has awards assemblies and parents of recipients are invited. We also have social events that parents are invited to such as barbques, Thanksgiving Feast, and Winter Feast. Parents are also invited to chaperone field trips four times a year. |
Student Enrollment by Grade Level
This table displays the number of students enrolled in each grade level at the school.
| Grade Level | Number of Students | Grade Level | Number of Students |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 0 | Grade 8 | 7 |
| Grade 1 | 0 | Ungraded Elementary | 0 |
| Grade 2 | 0 | Grade 9 | 5 |
| Grade 3 | 0 | Grade 10 | 4 |
| Grade 4 | 0 | Grade 11 | 3 |
| Grade 5 | 0 | Grade 12 | 0 |
| Grade 6 | 0 | Ungraded Secondary | 0 |
| Grade 7 | 1 | Total Enrollment | 20 |
Student Enrollment by Group
This table displays the percent of students enrolled at the school who are identified as being in a particular group.
| Group | Percent of Total Enrollment | Group | Percent of Total Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|
| African American | 5.0 | White (not Hispanic) | 40.0 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0.0 | Multiple or No Response | 5.0 |
| Asian | 0.0 | Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0.0 |
| Filipino | 0.0 | English Learners | 30.0 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 50.0 | Students with Disabilities | 28.0 |
| Pacific Islander | 0.0 | --- | --- |
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
This table displays by grade level the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom).
No data are available for this section
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
This table displays by subject area the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom).
| Subject | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | |||||||
| 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | ||||
| English | 18.0 | 2 | 13.7 | 3 | 10.0 | 4 | ||||||
| Mathematics | 18.5 | 2 | 18.0 | 1 | 1 | 10.0 | 2 | |||||
| Science | 18.5 | 2 | 19.0 | 1 | 10.0 | 1 | ||||||
| Social Science | 18.5 | 2 | 18.5 | 2 | 10.0 | 1 | ||||||
Participation in the Class Size Reduction Program
This table displays the percent of students in kindergarten trough grade 3 who were assigned to a classroom that participated in the Class Size Reduction Program.
No data are available for this section
II. School Climate
School Safety Plan
This section provides information about the school's comprehensive safety plan.
| Safe School and Emergency Response Plans are on file at our school and the district office. Plans are regularly reviewed, and staff is trained annually. Evacuation drills are held on an ongoing basis, and staff members using dangerous chemicals also receive training. There are four key elements of a safe school plan: • Safe schools are caring schools. Students in safe schools feel respected and know that the people care about them and expect them to succeed. • Safe schools are built through the cooperative effort of parents, students, staff and community members. • Safe schools communicate high standards. Students know that learning and achievement is encouraged and highly valued. • Safe schools are prepared. Ongoing training opportunities allow students and staff to increase their opportunity to deal with conflict, anger and other threats to safety. Safe schools have security checks on a regular basis to identify potential physical hazards or the school’s vulnerability to crime and vandalism. |
School Discipline Practices
This section provides information about the school's efforts to create and maintain a positive learning environment, including the school's use of disciplinary strategies.
|
Phillips’ school culture is built on the concept on respect. Staff is expected to treat students with respect, and in return, students are expected to treat staff in kind. We have set procedures on how to handle breeches in protocol by students and staff. Theses procedures are clearly displayed in both classrooms and are understood by both students and staff. Students are to be warned politely, then talked to outside the classroom door, then sent to the office to fill out a consequence sheet (This sheet reminds students of school rules and redirects the students thinking.), the student is then sent back to class to try again. If the students then fails to comply, and is sent to the office for a second time, that student can be suspended. Phillips staff maintains a positive learning environment by getting to know each student personally and by modifying their work to match their ability. Staff members are encouraged / expected to talk students during break and lunch, and take an interest in students’ personal lives. Staff members must earn students trust and respect before any real healing/work can get done. “At Risk” kids have to know that the adults they work with care. |
Suspensions and Expulsions
This
table displays the rate of suspensions and expulsions (the total number
of incidents divided by the total enrollment) at the school and
district levels for the most recent three-year period.
| Rate | School | District | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| Suspensions | * | * | * |
12% |
13% |
14% |
| Expulsions | 3 % | 0 | 25% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
* Number of suspension exceeds enrollment numbers because several students had multiple suspensions.
III. School Facilities
School Facility Conditions and Improvements
This
section provides information about the condition of the school's
grounds, buildings, and restrooms, and a description of any planned or
recently completed facility improvements.
Our school is a modern comprehensive high school that includes 2 classrooms and admin/counseling office. The facilities are well maintained, clean and have several places, on campus, that are considered state of the art for contemporary high schools. Our custodial and maintenance staff maintain, repair, and clean our facilities and campus on a regular basis. Phillips has been recently painted inside and out. The grounds, buildings and restrooms are in excellent condition. This year we plan to add 4 new computers per room to replace old ones. |
School Facility Conditions Good Repair Status
This table displays the results of the most recently completed school site inspection to determine the school facility's good repair status.
| Item Inspected | Facility in Good Repair | Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| Gas Leaks | Yes |
||
| Mechanical Systems | Yes |
||
| Windows/Doors/Gates (interior and exterior) | Yes |
||
| Interior Surfaces (walls, floors, and ceilings) | Yes |
||
| Hazardous Materials (interior and exterior) | Yes |
||
| Structural Damage | Yes |
||
| Fire Safety | Yes |
||
| Electrical (interior and exterior) | Yes |
||
| Pest/Vermin Infestation | Yes |
||
| Drinking Fountains (inside and outside) | Yes |
||
| Restrooms | Yes |
||
| Sewer | Yes |
||
| Playground/School Grounds | Yes |
||
| Other | |||
IV. Teachers
Teacher Credentials
This table displays the number of teachers assigned to the school with a full credential, without a full credential, and those teaching outside of their subject area of competence. Detailed information about teacher qualifications can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Teachers | School | District | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2005-06 | |
| With Full Credential | 2 | 3 | 3 | 374 |
| Without Full Credential | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence | --- | |||
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
This table displays the number of teacher misassignments (teachers assigned without proper legal authorization) and the number of vacant teacher positions (not filled by a single designated teacher assigned to teach the entire course at the beginning of the school year or semester). Note: Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.
| Indicator | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners | 0 | 1 | |
| Total Teacher Misassignments | 0 | 1 | |
| Vacant Teacher Positions | 0 | 0 |
Core Academic Classes Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
This table displays the percent of classes in core academic subjects taught by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) compliant and non-NCLB compliant teachers at the school, at all schools in the district, at high-poverty schools in the district, and at low-poverty schools in the district. More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.
| Location of Classes | Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects | |
|---|---|---|
| Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers | Taught by Non-NCLB Compliant Teachers | |
| This School | 52.2 | 47.8 |
| All Schools in District | 85.0 | 15.0 |
| High-Poverty Schools in District | 52.0 | 48.0 |
| Low-Poverty Schools in District | 60.0 | 40.0 |
Substitute Teacher Availability
This section provides information about the availability of qualified substitute teachers and the impact of any difficulties in this area on the school's instructional program.
| The district has a pool of substitute teachers available for assignment when a classroom teacher is absent. By State law, credentialed teachers may substitute at any grade level and in any subject. We try to place substitute teachers in their area of expertise. On rare occasions when substitutes are unavailable, administrators and other properly credentialed staff are assigned to cover classes. |
Teacher Evaluation Process
This section provides information about the procedures and the criteria for teacher evaluations.
| Providing high quality instruction is crucial. Our teachers are recognized throughout the county for their knowledge and expertise. Our staff is fully credentialed to teach within their subject or specialty areas. More than thirty percent of our teaching staff holds education credentials of a master’s degree or above. To honor our outstanding teaching professionals, our elementary schools have been named after former educators in the community. Many of these educators continue to remain active volunteers at their "namesake" schools. Teachers and administration collaborate through an established evaluation system. The principal formally evaluates tenured teachers every two years. Temporary and probationary teachers are evaluated yearly. All teachers are observed frequently. The evaluation may include instructional techniques, adherence to the curriculum, the learning and environments, and other assigned professional duties, as well as monitoring student progress. A formal evaluation includes teacher/administrator conferences, goal setting, classroom observations, and a written evaluation. If a teacher’s performance is not effective, the principal identifies areas requiring improvement and develops a program for improvements with the teacher. The principal is evaluated every year by a central office supervisors. |
V. Support Staff
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff
This table displays, in units of full-time equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic counselor. One FTE equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.
| Title | Number of FTE Assigned to School | Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Counselor | 0.8 | 40.0 |
| Library Media Teacher (Librarian) | --- | |
| Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) | --- | |
| Psychologist | .8 | --- |
| Social Worker | --- | |
| Nurse | --- | |
| Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist | --- | |
| Resource Specialist (non-teaching) | 1 | --- |
| Other | --- |
VI. Curriculum and Instructional Materials
Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials
This table displays information about the quality, currency, and availability of the standards-aligned textbooks and other instructional materials used at the school, and information about the school's use of any supplemental curriculum or non-adopted textbooks or instructional materials.
| Core Curriculum Area | Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials | Percent of Pupils Who Lack Their Own Assigned Textbooks and Instructional Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Reading/Language Arts | The Board of Trustees at the October 11th meeting, 2005 certified that there was a sufficiency of textbooks in all core areas including health and foreign language and adequate 9-12 laboratory space for the 2005-2006 school year. | 0 |
| Mathematics | 0 | |
| Science | 0 | |
| History-Social Science | 0 | |
| Foreign Language | 0 | |
| Health | 0 | |
| Science Laboratory Equipment (grades 9-12) | 0 |
VII. School Finances
Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
This table displays a comparison of the school's per pupil expenditures from unrestricted (basic) sources with other schools in the district and throughout the state, and a comparison of the average teacher salary at the school site with average teacher salaries at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.
| Level | Total Expenditures Per Pupil | Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental) | Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic) | Average Teacher Salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Site | 10,307.24 |
10,307.24 | 0 | $54,563 |
| District | --- | --- | $54,563 | |
| Percent Difference - School Site and District | --- | --- | ||
| State | --- | --- | $4,743 | $57,067 |
| Percent Difference - School Site and State | --- | --- |
Types of Services Funded
This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded through either categorical or other sources.
| TITLE I |
| TITLE V* |
| LIBRARY MATLS |
| NEW SCHL SAFETY |
| SPECIAL ED |
ALL SCHOOL SITES BENEFIT FROM DISTRICT WIDE RESOURCES SUCH AS INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS, LOTTERY, ROUTINE RESTRICTED MAINTENANCE, TITLE II PART A TEACHER QUALITY, DRUG FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES, FAMILY AND STUDENT RESOURCE CENTERS, SAFETY, TUPE, AND OTHERS.
|
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
This table displays district-level salary information for teachers, principals, and superintendents, and compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size. The table also displays teacher and administrative salaries as a percent of a district's budget, and compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size. Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/salaries0405.asp.
| Category | District Amount | State Average For Districts In Same Category |
|---|---|---|
| Beginning Teacher Salary | $35,488 | $37,730 |
| Mid-Range Teacher Salary | $52,104 | $59,397 |
| Highest Teacher Salary | $66,971 | $72,979 |
| Average Principal Salary (Elementary) | $77,533 | $90,266 |
| Average Principal Salary (Middle) | $84,570 | $95,759 |
| Average Principal Salary (High) | $90,770 | $103,395 |
| Superintendent Salary | $127,590 | $143,489 |
| Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries | 44.4 | 41.5 |
| Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries | 5.4 | 5.6 |
VIII. Student Performance
California Standards Tests
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. The CSTs include English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2 through 11; science in grades 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11; and history-social science in grades 8, 10, and 11. Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information regarding CST results for each grade and proficiency level, including the percent of students not tested, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
CST Results for All Students -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| English-Language Arts | 3 | 6 | 0 | 39 | 44 | 44 | 36 | 40 | 42 |
| Mathematics | 9 | 4 | 0 | 42 | 47 | 47 | 34 | 38 | 40 |
| Science | 0 | 28 | 29 | 34 | 25 | 27 | 35 | ||
| History-Social Science | 5 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 35 | 38 | 29 | 32 | 33 |
CST Results by Student Group - Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards) for the most recent testing period.
| Group | Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| English- Language Arts | Mathematics | Science | History- Social Science | |
| African American | * | * | * | * |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | * | |||
| Asian | ||||
| Filipino | * | * | * | |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | * | * | * |
| Pacific Islander | ||||
| White (Not Hispanic) | 0 | * | * | * |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Female | * | * | * | * |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 0 | 0 | * | * |
| English Learners | * | * | * | * |
| Students with Disabilities | * | * | * | * |
| Students Receiving Migrant Education Services | * | * | * | * |
Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
The norm-referenced test (NRT), currently the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition (CAT/6), shows how well students are doing compared to students nationally in reading, language, spelling, and mathematics in grades 3 and 7 only. The results are reported as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile). Detailed information regarding NRT results for each grade level can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
NRT Results for All Students -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics.
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| Reading | 6 | * | * | 48 | 49 | 52 | 43 | 41 | 42 |
| Mathematics | 20 | * | * | 54 | 56 | 57 | 51 | 52 | 53 |
NRT Results by Student Group -- Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics for the most recent testing period.
| Group | Percent of Students Scoring at or Above the National Average | |
|---|---|---|
| Reading | Mathematics | |
| African American | ||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | ||
| Asian | ||
| Filipino | ||
| Hispanic or Latino | * | * |
| Pacific Islander | ||
| White (not Hispanic) | * | * |
| Male | * | * |
| Female | ||
| Economically Disadvantaged | * | * |
| English Learners | * | * |
| Students with Disabilities | ||
| Students Receiving Migrant Education Services | * | * |
Local Assessment Results
Districts may choose to administer their own academic assessments in reading, writing, and mathematics. In such cases, this table displays the percent of students, by grade level and subject area, meeting or exceeding the district standard.
| Grade Level | Reading | Writing | Mathematics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| K | 79 | 83 | 83 | ||||||
| 1 | 70 | 73 | 69 | 68 | 72 | 68 | 69 | 79 | 75 |
| 2 | 70 | 68 | 71 | 63 | 66 | 66 | 78 | 82 | 81 |
| 3 | 67 | 66 | 65 | 64 | 62 | 60 | 69 | 72 | 61 |
| 4 | 63 | 64 | 60 | 62 | 66 | 68 | 53 | 56 | 60 |
| 5 | 72 | 66 | 72 | 70 | 70 | 71 | 56 | 58 | 57 |
| 6 | 45 | 58 | 41 | 31 | 35 | 51 | 31 | 50 | |
| 7 | 45 | 58 | 60 | 33 | 28 | 42 | 42 | 35 | |
| 8 | 45 | 78 | 64 | 44 | 28 | 37 | 43 | 20 | |
| 9 | |||||||||
| 10 | |||||||||
| 11 | |||||||||
| 12 | |||||||||
California Physical Fitness Test Results
The California Physical Fitness Test is administered to students in grades 5, 7, and 9 only. This table displays by grade level the percent of students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone on all six fitness standards) for the most recent testing period. Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test, and comparisons of a school's test results to the district and state levels, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
No data are available for this section
IX. Accountability
Academic Performance Index
The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of the academic performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed information about the API can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.
API Ranks -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the school's statewide and similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the school has an API score in the highest 10 percent of all schools in the state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100 statistically matched "similar schools." A similar schools rank of 1 means that the school's academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing 10 schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of 10 means that the school's academic performance is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
| API Rank | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statewide | B | B | |
| Similar Schools | B | B |
API Changes by Student Group -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays, by student group, the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant.
| Group | Actual API Change | API Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006 | |
| All Students at the School | -2 | |||
| African American | ||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | ||||
| Asian | ||||
| Filipino | ||||
| Hispanic or Latino | ||||
| Pacific Islander | ||||
| White (not Hispanic) | ||||
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | ||||
| English Learners | -- | -- | ||
| Students with Disabilities | -- | -- | ||
State Award and Intervention Programs
This section will contain information about the school's participation in various state intervention and award programs only to the extent these programs were funded for the period addressed by this report.
| |
Adequate Yearly Progress
The federal NCLB act requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria:
- Participation rate on the state's standards-based assessments in English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics
- Percent proficient on the state's standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics
- API as an additional indicator
- Graduation rate (for secondary schools)
AYP Overall and by Criteria
This table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the district met each of the AYP criteria.
| AYP Criteria | School | District |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Yes | No |
| Participation Rate - English-Language Arts | Yes | No |
| Participation Rate - Mathematics | Yes | No |
| Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts | Yes | No |
| Percent Proficient - Mathematics | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Graduation Rate | Yes | Yes |
Federal Intervention Program
Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (English-language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Detailed information about PI identification can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.
| Indicator | School | District |
|---|---|---|
| Program Improvement Status | Not in PI | Not In PI |
| First Year of Program Improvement Implementation | ||
| Year in Program Improvement | ||
| Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 3 |
| Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 25.0 |
X. School Completion and Postsecondary Preparation
Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate
This table displays the school's one-year dropout rates and graduation rates for the most recent three-year period. For comparison purposes, data are also provided at the district and state levels. Detailed information about dropout rates and graduation rates can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Indicator | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | |
| Dropout Rate (1-year) | 0.0 | 6.1 | 12.5 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
| Graduation Rate | 88.9 | 82.1 | 84.1 | 88.9 | 82.1 | 84.1 | 86.7 | 85.3 | 84.9 |
Completion of High School Graduation Requirements
Beginning with the graduating class of 2006, students in California public schools must pass both the English-language arts and mathematics portions of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) to receive a high school diploma. For students who began the 2005-06 school year in the 12th grade, this table displays by student group the percent of students who met all state and local graduation requirements for grade 12 completion, including having passed both portions of the CAHSEE or received a local waiver or state exemption. Due to the state's collection schedule for high school completion data, state level data for this reporting element will not be available for report cards published in the 2006-07 school year. Detailed information about the CAHSEE can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/hs/. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant.
| Group | Graduating Class of 2006 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| School | District | State | |
| All Students | --- | ||
| African American | --- | ||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | --- | ||
| Asian | --- | ||
| Filipino | --- | ||
| Hispanic or Latino | --- | ||
| Pacific Islander | --- | ||
| White (not Hispanic) | --- | ||
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | --- | ||
| English Learners | --- | ||
| Students with Disabilities | --- | ||
Career Technical Education Programs
This section provides information about the degree to which pupils are prepared to enter the workforce, including a list of career technical education (CTE) programs offered at the school.
| |
Career Technical Education Participation
This table displays information about participation in the school's CTE programs.
| Measure | CTE Program Participation |
|---|---|
| Number of Pupils | |
| Percent of pupils completing a CTE program and earning a high school diploma | |
| Percent of CTE courses sequenced or articulated between the school and institutions of postsecondary education |
Courses for University of California and/or California State University Admission
This table displays for the most recent year two measures related to the school's courses that are required for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) admission. Detailed information about student enrollment and completion of courses required for UC/CSU admission can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Indicator | Percent |
|---|---|
| Students Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission | 45.5 |
| Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission | 0.0 |
Advanced Placement Courses
This table displays for the most recent year the number of Advanced Placement (AP) courses that the school offered by subject and the percent of the school's students enrolled in all AP courses. Detailed information about student enrollment in AP courses can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Subject | Number of AP Courses Offered | Percent of Students In AP Courses |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | --- | |
| English |