| Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card, 2005-06 |
| For Paso Robles Independent Study Center School |
| Address: | 504 28th St., Paso Robles CA 93446-1206 | Phone Number: | (805) 237-3371 |
| Principal: | Bill Spencer | Grade Span: | K-12 |
| This executive summary of the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) is intended to provide parents and community members with a quick snapshot of school accountability. The data presented in this report are reported for the 2005-06 school year, except the School Finances and School Completion data that are reported for the 2004-05 school year. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should review the entire SARC or contact the school principal or the district office. |
| About This School |
| The mission statement of the K-12 Independent Study Center of Paso Robles Public Schools is to provide a safe and supportive learning environment for all our students and staff; to give instruction based on student need, state curriculum, state standards, and educational research; and, to encourage students to become productive members of their community. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
School Facilities
| Summary of Most Recent Site Inspection |
| Narrative to be provided by LEA |
| Repairs Needed |
| No major repairs necessary Minor concerns addressed through normal work order system. |
| Corrective Actions Taken or Planned |
| No major repairs necessary Minor concerns addressed through normal work order system. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year 2005-06 Published During 2006-07 |
| The School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which is required by law to be published annually, contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. More information about SARC requirements is available at the California Department of Education (CDE) Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest, an online data tool at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/, contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. |
I. About This School
Contact Information
This section provides the school's contact information.
| School | District | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| School Name | Paso Robles Independent Study Center | District Name | Paso Robles Joint Unified |
| Street | 504 28th St. | Phone Number | 805.238.2222 |
| City, State, Zip | Paso Robles, CA 93446-1206 | Web Site | www.pasoschools.org |
| Phone Number | 805.237.3371 | Superintendent | Patrick J. Sayne, Ed.D. |
| Principal | Bill Spencer | E-mail Address | psayne@king.prps.k12.ca.us |
| E-mail Address | bspencer@king.prps.k12.ca.us | --- | --- |
School Description and Mission Statement
This section provides information about the school's goals and programs.
| The mission statement of the K-12 Independent Study Center of Paso Robles Public Schools is to provide a safe and supportive learning environment for all our students and staff; to give instruction based on student need, state curriculum, state standards, and educational research; and, to encourage students to become productive members of their community. |
Opportunities for Parental Involvement
This section provides information about opportunities for parents to become involved with school activities.
| Because of the unique nature of the K-12 Independent Study Center, parents do take a very active and direct role and responsibility in the school. At the K-8 Independent Study/Home School, all parents work directly with the teacher to ensure educational success at heir weekly instructional meetings. Parental input and involvement is the hallmark of K-8 school’s academic success. At the 9-12 High School level, we have a work experience program for students working in the community. These employers provide valuable work experience for students during the school year. In addition, students may receive job training services through the Private Industry Council (PIC). The Private Industry Council provides up to 500 hours of job training at each site and pays the salary of the student with the understanding the student will be hired on after their training period. K-12 Independent Study Center has a School Site Council which provides feedback on needed changes in curriculum and instructional practices. Moreover, the majority of our community is beginning to view the K-12 Independent Study Center as a viable alternative to the more mainstream schools for students whose educational needs are not being achieved at the more traditional school. For information on volunteering at our school, contact the coordinator at 237-3370. |
Student Enrollment by Grade Level
This table displays the number of students enrolled in each grade level at the school.
| Grade Level | Number of Students | Grade Level | Number of Students |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 1 | Grade 8 | 6 |
| Grade 1 | 5 | Ungraded Elementary | 0 |
| Grade 2 | 2 | Grade 9 | 16 |
| Grade 3 | 8 | Grade 10 | 44 |
| Grade 4 | 4 | Grade 11 | 57 |
| Grade 5 | 4 | Grade 12 | 86 |
| Grade 6 | 4 | Ungraded Secondary | 0 |
| Grade 7 | 5 | Total Enrollment | 242 |
Student Enrollment by Group
This table displays the percent of students enrolled at the school who are identified as being in a particular group.
| Group | Percent of Total Enrollment | Group | Percent of Total Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|
| African American | 1.7 | White (not Hispanic) | 62.8 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 2.5 | Multiple or No Response | 4.1 |
| Asian | 0.8 | Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 7.3 |
| Filipino | 0.8 | English Learners | 7.0 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 27.3 | Students with Disabilities | 11.0 |
| Pacific Islander | 0.0 | --- | --- |
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
This table displays by grade level the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom).
| Grade Level | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | |||||||
| 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | ||||
| K | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 24.0 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||
| K-3 | ||||||||||||
| 3-4 | ||||||||||||
| 4-8 | ||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)
This table displays by subject area the average class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom).
| Subject | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | Avg. Class Size | Number of Classrooms | |||||||
| 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | 1-20 | 21-32 | 33+ | ||||
| English | 4.1 | 7 | 16.7 | 9 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| Mathematics | 4.3 | 3 | 5.4 | 7 | ||||||||
| Science | 4.7 | 3 | 12.5 | 11 | 1 | |||||||
| Social Science | 4.7 | 3 | 14.2 | 9 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Participation in the Class Size Reduction Program
This table displays the percent of students in kindergarten trough grade 3 who were assigned to a classroom that participated in the Class Size Reduction Program.
| Grade Level | Percent of Students Participating | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| K | |||
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
II. School Climate
School Safety Plan
This section provides information about the school's comprehensive safety plan.
|
There are two main components of safe and effective schools. Component one focuses on people and programs, while component two focuses on places or the physical environment of the school each component addresses the overall safety of the
school.
Component Two: Physical Environment: In this component, schools develop strategies to create a safe physical environment that is cheerful, comfortable, and free of dirty, dreary, or graffiti-filled buildings.
|
School Discipline Practices
This section provides information about the school's efforts to create and maintain a positive learning environment, including the school's use of disciplinary strategies.
|
Suspensions and Expulsions
This table displays the rate of suspensions and expulsions (the total number of incidents divided by the total enrollment) at the school and district levels for the most recent three-year period.
| Rate | School | District | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| Suspensions | 0 |
0 |
0 |
12% |
13% |
14% |
| Expulsions | 0 |
0 |
0 |
1% |
1% |
1% |
III. School Facilities
School Facility Conditions and Improvements
This section provides information about the condition of the school's grounds, buildings, and restrooms, and a description of any planned or recently completed facility improvements.
| The K-12 Independent Study School has two major centers. The K-8 Elementary School is located at our district ’ s Teachers’ Center. Facilities include two classrooms, computer area, teacher offices and assembly areas. The 9-12 high school is located at the Independent Study Center . Facilities include teachers ’ offices, counseling center, and two computer labs. Both the K-8 and the 9-12 Centers are free of any significant safety concerns. Both facilities are alarmed during the evening to protect school property. Each facility is clean, orderly, and conducive to student and staff safety. Each center has an Emergency Plan and Crisis Intervention Plan in operation. Our Emergency/Crisis Intervention Plans are updated each August to ensure their direct compliance with our District wide Safe School Plan. All teachers and staff have periodic reviews of all procedures and responsibilities. Our custodial staff, teaching staff, and students take great pride in our facilities which are maintained in a manner that assures students have a clean, safe and functional environment in which to learn. Our facilities exceed the "Good Repair" standard of the Williams Act. |
School Facility Conditions Good Repair Status
This table displays the results of the most recently completed school site inspection to determine the school facility's good repair status.
| Item Inspected | Facility in Good Repair | Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| Gas Leaks | Yes |
||
| Mechanical Systems | Yes |
||
| Windows/Doors/Gates (interior and exterior) | Yes |
||
| Interior Surfaces (walls, floors, and ceilings) | Yes |
||
| Hazardous Materials (interior and exterior) | Yes |
||
| Structural Damage | Yes |
||
| Fire Safety | Yes |
||
| Electrical (interior and exterior) | Yes |
||
| Pest/Vermin Infestation | Yes |
||
| Drinking Fountains (inside and outside) | Yes |
||
| Restrooms | Yes |
||
| Sewer | Yes |
||
| Playground/School Grounds | Yes |
||
| Other | |||
IV. Teachers
Teacher Credentials
This table displays the number of teachers assigned to the school with a full credential, without a full credential, and those teaching outside of their subject area of competence. Detailed information about teacher qualifications can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Teachers | School | District | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2005-06 | |
| With Full Credential | 11 | 14 | 16 | 374 |
| Without Full Credential | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence | --- | |||
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
This table displays the number of teacher misassignments (teachers assigned without proper legal authorization) and the number of vacant teacher positions (not filled by a single designated teacher assigned to teach the entire course at the beginning of the school year or semester). Note: Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.
| Indicator | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners | 4 | ||
| Total Teacher Misassignments | 4 | ||
| Vacant Teacher Positions | 0 |
Core Academic Classes Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers
This table displays the percent of classes in core academic subjects taught by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) compliant and non-NCLB compliant teachers at the school, at all schools in the district, at high-poverty schools in the district, and at low-poverty schools in the district. More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq/.
| Location of Classes | Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects | |
|---|---|---|
| Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers | Taught by Non-NCLB Compliant Teachers | |
| This School | 56.3 | 43.7 |
| All Schools in District | 85.0 | 15.0 |
| High-Poverty Schools in District | 52.0 | 48.0 |
| Low-Poverty Schools in District | 60.0 | 40.0 |
Substitute Teacher Availability
This section provides information about the availability of qualified substitute teachers and the impact of any difficulties in this area on the school's instructional program.
| The district has a pool of substitute teachers available for assignment when a classroom teacher is absent. By State law, credentialed teachers may substitute at any grade level and in any subject. We try to place substitute teachers in their area of expertise. On rare occasions when substitutes are unavailable, administrators and other properly credentialed staff are assigned to cover classes. |
Teacher Evaluation Process
This section provides information about the procedures and the criteria for teacher evaluations.
| Providing high quality instruction is crucial. Our teachers are recognized throughout the county for their knowledge and expertise. Our staff is fully credentialed to teach within their subject or specialty areas. More than thirty percent of our teaching staff holds education credentials of a master’s degree or above. To honor our outstanding teaching professionals, our elementary schools have been named after former educators in the community. Many of these educators continue to remain active volunteers at their "namesake" schools. Teachers and administration collaborate through an established evaluation system. The principal formally evaluates tenured teachers every two years. Temporary and probationary teachers are evaluated yearly. All teachers are observed frequently. The evaluation may include instructional techniques, adherence to the curriculum, the learning and environments, and other assigned professional duties, as well as monitoring student progress. A formal evaluation includes teacher/administrator conferences, goal setting, classroom observations, and a written evaluation. If a teacher’s performance is not effective, the principal identifies areas requiring improvement and develops a program for improvements with the teacher. The principal is evaluated every year by a central office supervisor. |
V. Support Staff
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff
This table displays, in units of full-time equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic counselor. One FTE equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.
| Title | Number of FTE Assigned to School | Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor |
|---|---|---|
| Academic Counselor | .2 | |
| Library Media Teacher (Librarian) | .2 | --- |
| Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) | 1 | --- |
| Psychologist | .2 | --- |
| Social Worker | --- | |
| Nurse | .2 | --- |
| Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist | --- | |
| Resource Specialist (non-teaching) | 1 | --- |
| Other | --- |
VI. Curriculum and Instructional Materials
Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials
This table displays information about the quality, currency, and availability of the standards-aligned textbooks and other instructional materials used at the school, and information about the school's use of any supplemental curriculum or non-adopted textbooks or instructional materials.
| Core Curriculum Area | Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials | Percent of Pupils Who Lack Their Own Assigned Textbooks and Instructional Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Reading/Language Arts | The Board of Trustees at the October 11th meeting, 2005 certified that there was a sufficiency of textbooks in all core areas including health and foreign language and adequate 9-12 laboratory space for the 2005-2006 school year. |
0 |
| Mathematics | 0 | |
| Science | 0 | |
| History-Social Science | 0 | |
| Foreign Language | 0 | |
| Health | 0 | |
| Science Laboratory Equipment (grades 9-12) | 0 |
VII. School Finances
Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
This table displays a comparison of the school's per pupil expenditures from unrestricted (basic) sources with other schools in the district and throughout the state, and a comparison of the average teacher salary at the school site with average teacher salaries at the district and state levels. Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.
| Level | Total Expenditures Per Pupil | Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental) | Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic) | Average Teacher Salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Site | 5,190.56 | 329.31 | 4,861.26 | $54,563 |
| District | 5,334.87 | 910.46 | 4,424.42 | $54,563 |
| Percent Difference - School Site and District | --- | --- | ||
| State | --- | --- | $4,743 | $57,067 |
| Percent Difference - School Site and State | --- | --- |
Types of Services Funded
This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded through either categorical or other sources.
| ALL SCHOOL SITES BENEFIT FROM DISTRICT WIDE RESOURCES SUCH AS INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS, LOTTERY, ROUTINE RESTRICTED MAINTENANCE, TITLE II PART A TEACHER QUALITY, DRUG FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES, FAMILY AND STUDENT RESOURCE CENTERS , SAFETY, TUPE, AND OTHERS. ALL ELEMENTARY SITES HAVE EARLY MENTAL HEALTH FUNDS AND CHILD CARE FUNDS. |
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2004-05)
This table displays district-level salary information for teachers, principals, and superintendents, and compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size. The table also displays teacher and administrative salaries as a percent of a district's budget, and compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size. Detailed information regarding salaries can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ and http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/salaries0405.asp.
| Category | District Amount | State Average For Districts In Same Category |
|---|---|---|
| Beginning Teacher Salary | $35,488 | $37,730 |
| Mid-Range Teacher Salary | $52,104 | $59,397 |
| Highest Teacher Salary | $66,971 | $72,979 |
| Average Principal Salary (Elementary) | $77,533 | $90,266 |
| Average Principal Salary (Middle) | $84,570 | $95,759 |
| Average Principal Salary (High) | $90,770 | $103,395 |
| Superintendent Salary | $127,590 | $143,489 |
| Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries | 44.4 | 41.5 |
| Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries | 5.4 | 5.6 |
VIII. Student Performance
California Standards Tests
The California Standards Tests (CST) show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. The CSTs include English-language arts and mathematics in grades 2 through 11; science in grades 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11; and history-social science in grades 8, 10, and 11. Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information regarding CST results for each grade and proficiency level, including the percent of students not tested, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
CST Results for All Students -- Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards).
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| English-Language Arts | 25 | 24 | 19 | 39 | 44 | 44 | 36 | 40 | 42 |
| Mathematics | 22 | 12 | 19 | 42 | 47 | 47 | 34 | 38 | 40 |
| Science | 11 | 9 | 9 | 28 | 29 | 34 | 25 | 27 | 35 |
| History-Social Science | 10 | 13 | 7 | 32 | 35 | 38 | 29 | 32 | 33 |
CST Results by Student Group - Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standards) for the most recent testing period.
| Group | Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| English- Language Arts | Mathematics | Science | History- Social Science | |
| African American | * | * | * | * |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | * | * | * | * |
| Asian | * | * | * | * |
| Filipino | * | * | ||
| Hispanic or Latino | 10 | 4 | 14 | 3 |
| Pacific Islander | ||||
| White (Not Hispanic) | 24 | 24 | 10 | 10 |
| Male | 14 | 25 | 9 | 5 |
| Female | 24 | 16 | 10 | 8 |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 15 | 13 | * | 6 |
| English Learners | 8 | * | * | * |
| Students with Disabilities | 9 | * | * | * |
| Students Receiving Migrant Education Services | * | * | * | * |
Norm-Referenced Test (NRT)
The norm-referenced test (NRT), currently the California Achievement Test, Sixth Edition (CAT/6), shows how well students are doing compared to students nationally in reading, language, spelling, and mathematics in grades 3 and 7 only. The results are reported as the percent of tested students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile). Detailed information regarding NRT results for each grade level can be found at the CDE Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
NRT Results for All Students -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics.
| Subject | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| Reading | 40 | * | 91 | 48 | 49 | 52 | 43 | 41 | 42 |
| Mathematics | 37 | * | 64 | 54 | 56 | 57 | 51 | 52 | 53 |
NRT Results by Student Group -- Most Recent Year
This table displays the percent of students, by group, scoring at or above the national average (the 50th percentile) in reading and mathematics for the most recent testing period.
| Group | Percent of Students Scoring at or Above the National Average | |
|---|---|---|
| Reading | Mathematics | |
| African American | ||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | * | * |
| Asian | ||
| Filipino | * | * |
| Hispanic or Latino | ||
| Pacific Islander | ||
| White (not Hispanic) | * | * |
| Male | * | * |
| Female | * | * |
| Economically Disadvantaged | ||
| English Learners | ||
| Students with Disabilities | ||
| Students Receiving Migrant Education Services | ||
Local Assessment Results
Districts
may choose to administer their own academic assessments in reading,
writing, and mathematics. In such cases, this table displays the
percent of students, by grade level and subject area, meeting or
exceeding the district standard.
| Grade Level |
Reading | Writing | Mathematics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |
| K | 79 | 83 | 83 | ||||||
| 1 | 70 | 73 | 69 | 68 | 72 | 68 | 69 | 79 | 75 |
| 2 | 70 | 68 | 71 | 63 | 66 | 66 | 78 | 82 | 81 |
| 3 | 67 | 66 | 65 | 64 | 62 | 60 | 69 | 72 | 61 |
| 4 | 63 | 64 | 60 | 62 | 66 | 68 | 53 | 56 | 60 |
| 5 | 72 | 66 | 72 | 70 | 70 | 71 | 56 | 58 | 57 |
| 6 | 45 | 58 | 41 | 31 | 35 | 51 | 31 | 50 | |
| 7 | 45 | 58 | 60 | 33 | 28 | 42 | 42 | 35 | |
| 8 | 45 | 78 | 64 | 44 | 28 | 37 | 43 | 20 | |
| 9 | |||||||||
| 10 | |||||||||
| 11 | |||||||||
| 12 | |||||||||
California Physical Fitness Test Results
The
California Physical Fitness Test is administered to students in grades
5, 7, and 9 only. This table displays by grade level the percent of
students meeting fitness standards (scoring in the healthy fitness zone
on all six fitness standards) for the most recent testing period.
Detailed information regarding the California Physical Fitness Test,
and comparisons of a school's test results to the district and state
levels, can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.
No data are available for this section
IX. Accountability
Academic Performance Index
The
Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual measure of the academic
performance and progress of schools in California. API scores range
from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed information
about the API can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.
API Ranks -- Three-Year Comparison
This
table displays the school's statewide and similar schools API ranks.
The statewide API rank ranges from 1 to 10. A statewide rank of 1 means
that the school has an API score in the lowest 10 percent of all
schools in the state, while a statewide rank of 10 means that the
school has an API score in the highest 10 percent of all schools in the
state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to
100 statistically matched "similar schools." A similar schools rank of
1 means that the school's academic performance is comparable to the
lowest performing 10 schools of the 100 similar schools, while a
similar schools rank of 10 means that the school's academic performance
is better than at least 90 of the 100 similar schools.
| API Rank | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statewide | 1 | ||
| Similar Schools | 2 |
API Changes by Student Group -- Three Year Comparison
This table displays, by student group, the actual API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not numerically significant.
| Group | Actual API Change | API Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006 | |
| All Students at the School | B | 48 | 579 | |
| African American | ||||
| American Indian or Alaska Native | ||||
| Asian | ||||
| Filipino | ||||
| Hispanic or Latino | ||||
| Pacific Islander | ||||
| White (not Hispanic) | 29 | 579 | ||
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | ||||
| English Learners | -- | -- | ||
| Students with Disabilities | -- | -- | ||
State Award and Intervention Programs
This section will contain information about the school's participation in various state intervention and award programs only to the extent these programs were funded for the period addressed by this report.
| |
Adequate Yearly Progress
The federal NCLB act requires that all schools and districts meet the following Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) criteria:
- Participation rate on the state's standards-based assessments in English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics
- Percent proficient on the state's standards-based assessments in ELA and mathematics
- API as an additional indicator
- Graduation rate (for secondary schools)
AYP Overall and by Criteria
This table displays an indication of whether the school and the district made AYP overall and whether the school and the district met each of the AYP criteria.
| AYP Criteria | School | District |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | No | No |
| Participation Rate - English-Language Arts | No | No |
| Participation Rate - Mathematics | No | No |
| Percent Proficient - English-Language Arts | Yes | No |
| Percent Proficient - Mathematics | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Graduation Rate | Yes | Yes |
Federal Intervention Program
Schools and districts receiving federal Title I funding enter Program Improvement (PI) if they do not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area (English-language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or graduation rate). After entering PI, schools and districts advance to the next level of intervention with each additional year that they do not make AYP. Detailed information about PI identification can be found at the CDE Web site at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/.
| Indicator | School | District |
|---|---|---|
| Program Improvement Status | Not In PI | |
| First Year of Program Improvement Implementation | ||
| Year in Program Improvement | ||
| Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 3 |
| Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement | --- | 25.0 |
X. School Completion and Postsecondary Preparation
Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate
This table displays the school's one-year dropout rates and graduation rates for the most recent three-year period. For comparison purposes, data are also provided at the district and state levels. Detailed information about dropout rates and graduation rates can be found at the CDE Web site at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/.
| Indicator | School | District | State | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2002-03 | |||